IT investments deliver profits, study finds

Spending on revenue-enhancing IT systems more beneficial than focusing on streamlining processes to cut costs

Investing in IT departments can have a big impact on a firm’s profits, more so than similar spending on R&D and some marketing endeavors, according to a team of university reasearchers.

The researchers reached their conclusions after examining the IT investments and financial data of about 450 companies in an effort to draw a link between IT spending and profits.

The work, published in the journal, MIS Quarterly , led to several key conclusions.

First, IT investments are “positively associated with profitability,” according to the research paper .

The researchers said they were able to look deep enough at these unidentified global firms to draw insights into the type of IT investments that are most helpful. They found that companies are better off spending on projects that create revenue instead of reducing costs.

For instance, a company that builds or buys a business intelligence system that helps sell products will see more bottom line benefits than a company that spends IT dollars to automate internal processes to trim expenses, said the paper’s lead author, Sunil Mithas, an associate professor Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland.

He noted that cost cutting systems are likely not unique, and thus don’t offer a competitive advantage. “Your vendors will sell the same system to your competitors,” Mithas said.

But firms that spend IT dollars on revenue generating products may come up with systems that “are highly differentiated from your competition” said Mithas, “It will be very hard for your competition to replicate that.”

Mithas said the team was unable to pinpoint an optimum level of IT spending.

Some firms are good at managing IT spending consistently, while others may pull back on IT investments after a failed project, and thus become a laggard.

The team, which also included researchers from the University of Illinois, the University of Texas, and the IE Business School in Madrid, Spain, concluded that that IT investments are more likely to enhance profits than advertising or R&D spending.

MCTS Certification, MCITP Certification

Microsoft MCTS Certification, MCITP Certification and over 2000+
Exams with Life Time Access Membership at https:://www.actualkey.com

Even in R&D and advertising intensive businesses, such as the pharmaceutical industry, strong IT investments can prove fruitful. The paper cited a project Pfizer which “enabled virtual teams from different business units around the world to collaborate in research and develop new drugs.”

The researchers examined IT investment and financial data from 1998 to 2003.

Mithas said there is no reason to believe that anything has changed since then — even with constantly changing technology.

The IT spending data was gleaned from surveys conducted by a consulting firm that the researchers didn’t identify due to a non-disclosure agreement. Mithas could only say that the firm is among the top IT consulting companies in the world.

The absence of a identified source for the IT spending data in this paper drew criticism from Paul Strassmann , a former U.S. Department of Defense CIO and acting CIO of NASA who has written about the correlation of IT and profits.

Strassmann said that “unless the authors disclose the origins of the critical IT numbers, the entire paper must be considered speculation and not verifiable analytic proof.”

Mithas said the paper went through “a blind peer-review process by top academic scholars familiar with this domain of enquiry and such relevant data related details were shared with them.”

The reviewers “appeared satisfied with the data quality and procedures we used for analyses.”

Mithas said the findings are strong and said a characterization of the study’s findings as speculation “is a little extreme.”

MCTS Certification, MCITP Certification

Microsoft MCTS Certification, MCITP Certification and over 2000+
Exams with Life Time Access Membership at https:://www.actualkey.com

Microsoft counted as key Linux contributor, for now anyway

Microsoft’s work on the Hyper-V driver accounted for a significant chunk of recent Linux kernel development

For the first time ever, and probably only temporarily, Microsoft can be counted as a key contributor to Linux.

The company, which once portrayed the open-source OS kernel as a form of cancer, has been ranked 17th on a tally of the largest code contributors to Linux.

COME AGAIN? Microsoft: ‘We love open source’
The Linux Foundation’s Linux Development Report, released Tuesday, summarizes who has contributed to the Linux kernel, from versions 2.6.36 to 3.2. The 10 largest contributors listed in the report are familiar names: Red Hat, Intel, Novell, IBM, Texas Instruments, Broadcom, Nokia, Samsung, Oracle and Google. But the appearance of Microsoft is a new one for the list, compiled annually.
MCTS Training, MCITP Trainnig

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training
at certkingdom.com

Overall, Microsoft contributed 688 changes, or about 1.0 percent of the accepted changes to the kernel, since version 2.6.36. Company engineers also signed off on 2,174 changes, or about 1.1 percent of all the changes in this review period.

Much of the work Microsoft did centers around providing drivers for its own Hyper-V virtualization technology. Microsoft’s Hyper-V, part of Windows Server, can run Linux as a guest OS. Linux kernel developer and LWN.net editor Jon Corbet, a co-author of the study, estimates that Microsoft’s involvement peaked around last year’s 3.0 release of Linux and will diminish over time. “Even the [hypervisor] drivers can only need so much cleaning up,” he wrote in an article explaining the influx of Microsoft contribution.

For the Linux Foundation, Microsoft’s involvement in Linux shows how widely used the OS kernel is these days. Microsoft must work with Linux to be part of the larger enterprise computing ecosystem.

In the time period covered by the report, more than 1,000 developers from nearly 200 companies contributed to the kernel. Lone contributors provided the largest number of changes, 11,413 changes or about 16.2 percent of all the changes in this review period. Among contributions from companies, Red Hat provided the most changes, or 7,563, or 10.7 percent of all changes. After Red Hat, Intel provided the next largest batch of changes, 5,075, or about 7.2 percent of all changes.

On average, between 8,000 and 12,000 patches are added to each new kernel release, which, overseen by Linus Torvalds, come out every two or three months. The vast majority of these changes are developed by outside parties.

In addition to Corbet, Linux kernel maintainer and Linux Foundation fellow Greg Kroah-Hartman, and Linux Foundation Vice President of Marketing and Developer Services Amanda McPherson co-wrote the report.

The Linux Foundation is a nonprofit organization devoted to further developing and maintaining the open-source Linux kernel. It is funded by companies that use Linux in their products and services, including Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Novell and Oracle.